🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.